Close Issues and Rough Corners in Using as a GPL Development Tool
Hi,
Is it possible to close gaps in MPS with regard to using this as a general purpose language development tool. Also better optimisation of output and using low level languages like Byte Code, CLI, LLVM IR, ASM, Machine Code targeting and as base languages?
With translation between languages planned this would mean you can translate between the low level languages.
Ideally I would like to see MPS come to maturity where it can be used as the core of all you language products which would mean this has become a solid tool.
Suminda
Is it possible to close gaps in MPS with regard to using this as a general purpose language development tool. Also better optimisation of output and using low level languages like Byte Code, CLI, LLVM IR, ASM, Machine Code targeting and as base languages?
With translation between languages planned this would mean you can translate between the low level languages.
Ideally I would like to see MPS come to maturity where it can be used as the core of all you language products which would mean this has become a solid tool.
Suminda
Please sign in to leave a comment.
It is not that this would not be possible, just the focus is on DSLs, since this seems like a more viable direction for MPS.
So please make this PLT Paradise tool.